Platform
Governance by Design
See where every AI system stands, from first classification to post-market monitoring. Three products: the AI Intelligence Centre, the Integrity Engine and AI Literacy. Each module exists because a regulation requires an answer, and each traces to the Article or Annex that requires it.
- Hosted in the UK and EU
- 2 Pending patents
- research-grade regulatory record
Built Around How Each Obligation Applies
Obligation system of record
AI Intelligence Centre
Classify your systems, run guided discovery, score the gaps and ask questions of the regulations in plain language. Every answer is cited to its source.
- Risk classification and gap analysis
- Guided discovery, routed to owners
- Cited regulatory navigator
Chain of custody · pending patent
Integrity Engine
Continuous post-market monitoring, held as a tamper-evident chain of custody. Every event is sealed, so one record serves the regulator, the auditor and a liability claim.
- Continuous post-market signal capture
- Tamper-evident event sealing
- Incident reporting on each authority's clock
Article 26(2) · Article 4 · The foundation
AI Literacy
Where most teams start. Deployers must give human oversight to people with the competence, training and authority it needs (Article 26(2)), and Article 4 still asks for AI literacy. A curriculum by role, tied to the obligations each role owns, with attestation for each seat. The other two products build on it.
See AI Literacy- A curriculum by role, for Article 26(2) and Article 4
- Attestation and evidence for each seat
- Deploys in weeks
Research-grade regulatory record
250+ EU & UK Instruments
6,800 AI system archetypes. Thousands of individual obligations. Over 80,000 citations, every one traced to its source text.
Every Module Traces to an Obligation
Checklists tie a control to a named act. We map each obligation, so one body of evidence answers many regimes, and the conflicts between them show early.
- Evidential
- Continuous
- Obligation-level
- By design
- Article 6 · Annex III
- Risk classificationA guided evaluation to a definitive risk tier, checked against the full prohibited-practices catalogue.
- Live
- Annex IV
- Guided discoverySingle questions, each asked once, routed to the person responsible, with evidence attached.
- Live
- Cited retrieval
- Regulatory navigatorAnswers drawn from the growing corpus of instruments, with every citation checked twice.
- Live
- Continuous scoring
- Compliance gap analysisLive scoring, a heat map of the gaps, and remediation in priority order.
- Beta
- Article 72 · pending patent
- Post-market monitoringDrift detection, reclassification triggers, and incident reporting to each authority's deadline.
- In development
- Article 26(2) · Article 4
- AI literacyCertification by role, tied to the obligations each role owns, with attestation for each seat.
- Live
Status is indicative. Article references are checked against the consolidated text before publication.
The Method Behind the Platform
TRACE is how we turn a regulation into evidence you can hand a regulator. Five steps, run once for every regime.
Triage
The AI systems you run and the obligations that attach to each.
Rate
Each system by risk tier against the Act's criteria.
Architect
The controls and documentation each tier requires.
Control
The operations that keep those controls live.
Evidence
The result, so the file stands up when someone asks.
White paper
From Obligation to Evidence
TRACE, a five-phase loop, governs AI systems under overlapping instruments from one register of obligations.
