Blog

Conformity Assessment

From Obligation to Evidence: A Methodology for Multi-Regulatory AI Governance

by Standard Intelligence

A single AI system rarely sits under a single rulebook. This paper sets out TRACE, a five-phase methodology for governing AI across overlapping frameworks, and a maturity model for locating where an organisation stands.

AI GovernanceRegulatory Technology

Self-Assessment or Notified Body? Choosing the Right Conformity Pathway

by Standard Intelligence

Which high-risk AI can be self-assessed, and which needs a notified body? This paper maps the pathways category by category, with the declaration of conformity and post-market duties.

AI Governance

Editorial-black-and-white--photograph-in-the-style-of-long-form-journalism-Bloomberg-Businessweek-FT-Weekend-Reuters-Witness-A-compliance-professional-sits-at-a-desk-off-centre-to-the-right-in-a-calm-focused-pose-leaning-slightly-over-printed-conform.png

Conformity Assessment: What Providers Need to Know Before February 2027

by Michael Clark

The EU AI Act requires conformity assessments for high-risk AI systems. Here is what the process involves and how to prepare.

EU AI ActRegulatory Technology

Annex IV Is a Living File, Not a One-Off: What Notified Bodies Actually Expect

by Standard Intelligence

Annex IV is not a one-off deliverable. It is a living technical file across fourteen elements, and the standard notified bodies expect is higher than the text suggests.

AI Governance