Blog

Compliance

Representative or Minimal? Training Data Between the AI Act and the GDPR

by Standard Intelligence

Article 10 and the GDPR pull in opposite directions on training data. This paper maps the conflicts, including representativeness versus minimisation, and offers a practical framework.

AI Governance

Create-an-editorial-monochrome--cover-image-in-the-style-of-Bloomberg-Businessweek-or-FT-Weekend-illustrating-methodical-high-risk-AI-classification-and-compliance-work-under-the-EU-AI-Act-Show-a-single-compliance-or-risk-manager-in-a-European-office.png

Understanding High-Risk AI Classification Under the EU AI Act

by Michael Clark

The EU AI Act introduces a risk-based framework for regulating AI systems. Understanding how high-risk classification works is the first step toward compliance.

EU AI Act

Article 72: Post-Market Monitoring Without a Second Compliance Programme

by Standard Intelligence

Article 72 requires a post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI. Done well, it reuses the infrastructure you already run rather than spawning a second compliance programme.

AI Governance

Article 4 Has Been Live Since February 2025. Is Your AI Literacy Programme Real?

by Standard Intelligence

Article 4 has been enforceable since February 2025. Sufficient AI literacy is contextual, not universal, and a tiered, role-based programme is the only model that holds up.

AI Governance

Risk Classification Under the AI Act: The Decision That Sets Everything Else

by Standard Intelligence

Classification is the first legal obligation and the costliest to get wrong. This guide maps the four tiers, the Article 6(3) exception, and the modern edge cases that break old frameworks.

AI Governance

The EU AI Act, End to End: What Boards Actually Need to Decide

by Standard Intelligence

A whole-regime view of the EU AI Act for boards and compliance leaders: risk classification, the eight high-risk pillars, GPAI duties, enforcement, and a five-action roadmap.

AI Governance